Sean Legassick wrote:
> On 2000.12.04 16:34:57 +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Sorry about Torque, what you actually fixed I have working here. I
>> should have left it working in CVS and pushed in a complete fix.
>> I unexpectedly became preoccupied with something else :-) Thanks
>> for fixing it.
>
>
> No problem, it was an opportunity to have fun (!) finding my way around
the
> implementation. Which reminds me - I have a patch to add an "implements"
> attribute to the table tag, which as you might expect specifies an
> interface that the BaseObject subclass will implement. Any objections?
Where would it take actual implementation from? Or you want to make it
abstract?
I would much rather suggest that you do not change the object, but just
subclass it implementing any interfaces.
$0.02
fedor.
_______________________________________________________
Tired of slow Internet? Get @Home Broadband Internet
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
