> Hi Rafal and Sean, thanks for your help!
>
Rafal wrote:
> Some time ago, an idea crossed my mind, that we might want to introduce
> another layer of templating, namely Page template. It would contain
> the common elements of all Layout templates used in conjuncion with
> WebMacrOnlyLayout class. An application will use precisely one
> Page template, the same way as it uses single Page class now.
> This would bring us back to the separation between head and body parts
> of the page we had with ECS, but with template driven customization
> of head elements available to the developer.
>
1. This might provide for neat further separation. Beware though: as far as
I see right now, the screen-only-writers would loose their chance of writing
into the head, which they have right now in the ECS-model. Maybe some sites
dont like the idea of giving write access to such a central part of an
application to a potential manifold of people.
2. Why do you propose to have only one page-template? Why not have many mith
the same lookup-scheme as for layouts. Do I understand you right that the
aim of the page template is precisely the HEAD-part (since everything else
is canonical?) I would in this case prefer calling them head-templates and
potentially have many.
regards, Alexander
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Banthien
JusTec GmbH
Haslacher Str. 126
79115 Freiburg
Germany
Tel:+49 (0) 761 401269 00
Fax:+49 (0) 761 401269 13
WWW: http://www.justec.de
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
