Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo wrote: > You voted +1, Sean voted +0, I'm (of course) +1. This means > we need one extra +1, right? Anybody? Should I write a more > formal proposal for how this would be implemented? Proposal would be nice, you can use it later for documentation. Rafal -- Rafal Krzewski Senior Internet Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl ------------------------------------------------------------ To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Accessing peer columns by name Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo
- Re: Accessing peer columns by name Jon Stevens
- Re: Accessing peer columns by name Fedor Karpelevitch
- RE: Accessing peer columns by name Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo
- RE: Accessing peer columns by name Sean Legassick
- Re: Accessing peer columns by name Jon Stevens
- Re: Accessing peer columns by n... Sean Legassick
- RE: Accessing peer columns by name Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo
- Re: Accessing peer columns by name Rafal Krzewski
- Re: Accessing peer columns by name Jon Stevens
- RE: Accessing peer columns by name Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo
- RE: Accessing peer columns by name Sean Legassick
- Re: Accessing peer columns by name Jon Stevens
- RE: Accessing peer columns by name Diethelm Guallar, Gonzalo
