> > You voted +1, Sean voted +0, I'm (of course) +1. This means
> > we need one extra +1, right? Anybody? Should I write a more
> > formal proposal for how this would be implemented?
>
> Proposal would be nice, you can use it later for documentation.
Ok, but Sean also wrote:
> Trivial - famous last words :-/ Well, it's not too bad - I'm working on it
> now. Main problem is needing to wrap primitive types in their
> Object-derived wrappers to return them from the method. Should have
> something in next couple of days...
Sean, do you wish to coordinate with me to help you in any way
I can, or would you rather go solo with it until you have something
showable?
--
Gonzalo A. Diethelm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
