> Following this thread, it seems to me that DynamicURI can only return
> absolute URL, but can be easily extended to return relative URL.
>
> >From where I am standing, relative URLs from DynamicURI seems to be a
> general functionality, and it seems silly that everyone that is behind a
> firewall or something should have to write the code himself. So I think a
> patch to DynamicURI, allowing this to be configured with a static function
> or TurbineResources.properties would be entirely justifiable, provided of
> course that it is fully backwards compatible and efficient.
>
> My two cents,
>
> Magnus
What the heck does being behind a firewall have to do with anything?
<http://www.working-dogs.com/daily/>
I would be +1 to see a RelativeDynamicURI class added to Turbine, but I'm
not going to write it.
-jon
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
