Agreed, I'll write an RelativeDynamicURI class and submit it.
Just one more point:
It would be much easier, if someone could change the private stuff in
DynamicURI to protected...
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: Absolute URLs in HTML code
> > Following this thread, it seems to me that DynamicURI can only return
> > absolute URL, but can be easily extended to return relative URL.
> >
> > >From where I am standing, relative URLs from DynamicURI seems to be a
> > general functionality, and it seems silly that everyone that is behind a
> > firewall or something should have to write the code himself. So I think
a
> > patch to DynamicURI, allowing this to be configured with a static
function
> > or TurbineResources.properties would be entirely justifiable, provided
of
> > course that it is fully backwards compatible and efficient.
> >
> > My two cents,
> >
> > Magnus
>
> What the heck does being behind a firewall have to do with anything?
>
> <http://www.working-dogs.com/daily/>
>
> I would be +1 to see a RelativeDynamicURI class added to Turbine, but I'm
> not going to write it.
>
> -jon
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
