Re: Turbine Services as plugins

[Daniel Rall]

Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I think this would also help with the current layout
> of the packages. I'm personally not very keen on the
> 
> org.apache.turbine.services.X
> org.apache.turbine.util.X
> 
> layout that has evolved. I think all the code for
> service should be together. Utilities for a particular
> service, that are required for the service to work, are
> really part of the service and I think that code should
> the code should be grouped together.

+1 on grouping the related code together.
-- 

Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]