on 1/15/01 2:38 PM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what about the following:
>
> 1) Reorganize the the turbine, tdk, and flux repositories
> so that they reside under a single directory in preparation
> to a move Jakarta.
+1. Please post a directory structure for us to approve. I'm +1 on doing one
more re-import of Turbine before release. We have a lot of cruft in CVS
again.
> 2) Reorganize the util/service code simply to group common
> code together, forget about the pluggable services
> for now. This way even when we do add pluggable services
> the packages should pretty much stay the same and not
> cause much grief. But I definitely think the code
> has to grouped better before release.
+1
> 3) Clean up the docs.
+1
> 4) Add a testbed
Not 100% necessary but would be nice. It isn't on my requirements for
release.
> 5) Release
+1
> Somewhere in this cycle I guess we will move to Jakarta,
> or if we are ready to release will we just go to turbine.apache.org.
Right.
> The pluggable services can wait, if we want to get a release
> out then I say we feature freeze and over the next two weeks
> try and get the docs and some form of a testbed going.
+1
> After we release then we can focus on changing the way
> services work and general improvement, but for now
> lets try and get a release out. Is there anything
> really missing (besides docs, and testbed) that would
> prevent us from releasing?
#1. Need to get the <form> OR code that John is working on in.
#2. Need to go over all the source code and make the license consistent.
#3. Need to go over all the source code and make sure formatting is correct.
#4. Need to go over all the source code, line by line, and make sure that
there are no glaring errors.
#5. I would like to see the site updated to use Jakarta-Site2 as a
dependency instead of Stylebook. This isn't a requirement, but is a wish.
> If we agree, I can 1) tonight, and start 2) tomorrow night
> to get the ball rolling. I believe there are few people who
> want to work on the docs, and there is a start of a testbed.
> I think the testbed will probably be the biggest hurdle but
> I think something is necessary, I don't you can release a
> piece of software without a testbed.
Right, but building tests is going to be difficult.
> Can we agree on this and get the ball rolling?
+1
-jon
--
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
