[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree that it makes sense but it may also make people easily forget that
> some implementation of TurbineSecurity have to treat password fields in
> a specific way.
> Now given than Turbine has a DBMS bias, it's just as well to give the most
> simple and understandable API for DBMS implementation users.
I'm fighting for making Turbine security implementaion independent, but
few
developers seem to share my views :-(.
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
