[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Still, you can definitely define a TurbineDBSecurity accessor class that
> provide method signatures that only work with DBMS based implementation but
> which are more intuitive for these users.
Having two accessor classes seems like more complexity and confusion
instead of less :-)
Rafal
--
Rafal Krzewski
Senior Internet Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+48 22 8534830 http://e-point.pl
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
