> > I was reading the getting-started about the Object-Relational model and
was
> > trying to figure if that particular part of Turbine can be use without
> > Turbine as we already wrote our own framework and don't want to rewrite
it
> > with Turbine.
>
> This sounds a bit strange to me. You have a framework, and you
> definetely
> want to use Turbine at the same time, but you are not sure which part?
> Come on...
If that is what appears from my message, then, it's inaccurate. We have a
framework and the part of Turbine that interest us is the Peers and Torque
(as they seems to work together). The goal is to replace the method that
actually talk to the database by something that will abstract the database
layer so we can change it easily.
> The turbine documentation has two docs about Peers and another about
> Torque
> (the tool to generate O-R mapping code automatically)
> Peers are actually used by DBSecurityService (see om.security and
> om.security.peer
> packages) but I would not recommend it as an example - it's a bit messy.
> There are also a few example applications, but I can'r recall the URLs
> right now.
> Check the list archive. The address is at the very bottom of this
> message.
Thank you. I'll take some time to see how Torque work. I think I have the
basic understanding of how peers work and one of the thing I wanted to
confirm is how to construct the classes like MyTablePeers. Is this what is
generated by Torque?
Etienne
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
