On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, ernst leonhard wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I' d like to use the User-Management and ACL (Access Control List) based
> security system. What does I have do if I want to extend the
> TURBINE_USER table ?
> 
> 1) extend the "turbine-schema.xml"
> 2) create the java-classes with torque
> 3) more to do ?

I am still working on a way to integrate Flux (the turbine admin
app) into the TDK. I think this will end up allowing the definition
of a user type via XML and generating a class that implements the
User Interface or extends TurbineUser. If you want to go ahead
and start something feel free as I won't get to it for a couple
of weeks.

Unfortunately the internal peer system of turbine is not
generated with Torque. I think once this is done it will
make the user aspect of the security system more flexible.
I don't think the group/role/permission setup will need
to change much, but I think that almost every project will
change the user definition.

> Another question:
> It's possible that I have to use a LDAP server to administer the users.
> What' s todo in this case:
> 
> 1) change "services.TurbineSecurityService.user.manager" in the property
> file
> 2) implement UserManager interface
> 3) more to do ?

You would have to implement a security service and a user
manager. There has been some discussion of this on the list.

I think Rafal has the start of a security system that uses
LDAP. Hey Rafal is there any change that you could post what
you have in the proposals directory so people could help out
with making a full LDAP security service. I think you mentioned
that it currently is a hybridized db/ldap implementation. Mabye
the few people who have asked for an LDAP security service
could help stripped the db portions of what you have and
make it fully LDAP. Just a suggestion.

jvz.



------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to