If we put all the om/peer
> > objects in one package but still present the source files as
> >
> > om/
> > om/peer
> > om/base
> > om/base/peer
> >
> > would this cause any problems or criticism?
>
> I don't follow you.
I would like
om/Foo.java
om/peer/FooPeer.java
om/base/BaseFoo.java
om/base/peer/BaseFooPeer.java
to compile to
om/Foo.class
om/FooPeer.class
om/BaseFoo.class
om/BaseFooPeer.class
I'm not sure how easy it is to do something like this. We can do it
easy enough with Ant, since we are copying the src tree into a build
directory before compiling. But my guess is that it could mess with
some other build systems. I am hoping that it is doable, but I can live
without it.
John McNally
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
