> -----Original Message-----
> From: John McNally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 3:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [PROPOSAL] om/peer package organization
[SNIPPED]
> The other thing I would like some comment on is the
> reservations people
> would have to violating the file hierarchy/package structure symmetry
> that is generally followed in java src trees. If we put all
> the om/peer
> objects in one package but still present the source files as
>
> om/
> om/peer
> om/base
> om/base/peer
>
> would this cause any problems or criticism?
-1
Confusing and I believe other dev tools may not like this ( Visual Age,
JBuilder, etc. )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message has been scanned for viruses with Trend Micro's Interscan VirusWall.
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/turbine%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
