On 6月28日, 上午3時30分, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to start a conversation about the future of TurboGears
> documentation issues, and to start planning for the 1.1 and 2.0
> releases.
>
> 1.1 will be reliatively easy -- we'll be able to port a lot of our
> existing docs across to 1.1 as is.  Docs which talk about templates,
> should be converted to Genshi, and docs that talk about Kid should be
> converted to SQLAlchemy.
>
> The biggest projects will be to move the 20 min wiki tutorial over to
> the new tools, and to go through all of the widget docs and make sure
> that we are using the ET() wrapper around widget render calls.
>
> Do you think it would make sense to have a tg 1.1 doc sprint sometime
> in mid July?
>
> As for TurboGears 2.0.  Right now I'm focusing on creating good
> developer docs, good docstrings, and good in-code comments.   I want
> it to be a lot easier to understand, and I want us to be able to
> quickly and easily generate API docs from the code.
>
> --
> Mark Ramm-Christense
> email: mark at compoundthinking dot com
> blog:www.compoundthinking.com/blog

I was working on an SQLAlchemy doc-style all-in-one tutorial based
upon 1.0 docs and clean the download&install section a bit.
http://docs.turbogears.org/1.1/RoughDocs/Tutorial

Fortunately its based upon genshi and SQLAlchemy by default, and the
doc haven't migrated to cp3 yet :P

I think to make an SQLAlchemy doc-style tutorial, which cover major
dev methods/functions and links to the references, might bring more
motivation than just migrate docs from 1.0.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Docs" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-docs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to