On 6/27/07, Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > > > 1.1 will be reliatively easy -- we'll be able to port a lot of our > > existing docs across to 1.1 as is. Docs which talk about templates, > > should be converted to Genshi, and docs that talk about Kid should be > > converted to SQLAlchemy. > > I agree, it's not a massive change. And I'm game for a sprint in July. > > I think the main decision is how we recommend using SQLAlchemy. I reckon > most TG users will want to use the Active Record pattern, as it's simpler > than the Data Mapper pattern. Should we embrace Elixir as the recommended > way to use SA with TG? I have to admit I've still not touched Elixir, I have > found ActiveMapper to be adequate for my needs.
I remember we had several goings back and forth with the first package by Jonathan, can't recall it's name but it was pre-elixir we had the problem that people where expecting SA and found *that* and then we had the other problem that the layer wasn't exactly "completed" I say we stick with "plain SA" and have specialiced docs for the "other layers", kind of what we'll have for genshi and other templates. > > Paul > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Docs" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-docs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
