Alberto Valverde wrote: > > Ok, ignore_key_missing is not that bad... >
:-) > > For every field that might generate input: yes IMO. It just sounds > "good parctice" to me... Kevin, where are you? :) Sounds good, let's hear Kevin but I think you can commit what you and fine tune it later... ;-) > > Because the function is called "include_in_path" :D, if there's not a > full_qualified_form attribute then the field should be included... Yes, I know I'm stupid... :D > > Sure! :) Great... > > Thanks! :) I say it again, excellent work... > > P.S. Committing validation9.patch real soon (with ignore_key_missing > and the compound stuff)... Great!!! Ciao Michele --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
