Kevin Dangoor wrote: > On 3/18/06, Simon Belak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Michele Cella wrote: >>> Mmm, actually I'm not so sure we should support something like this, it >>> wouldn't be a standard python behavior I guess... >>> >>> How is this related to Simon fail-safe mechanism? >> I suppose it is an option, but it doesn't solve much, as we still need >> to provide some default approach for dealing with defaults. Having said >> that, I wouldn't mind one single bit to flesh it out some more and >> decouple it from error handling. > > I actually feel like I'm missing some context when I read that ticket. > I'm not sure which defaults we're talking about and in what context > it's really an issue.
Defaults for method parameters. More specifically, defaults for inputs. Currently it's well-nigh impossible to have meaningful defaults for nested forms. Cheers, Simon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
