On 3/31/06, Alberto Valverde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 31/03/2006, at 11:55, Michele Cella wrote: > > ATM I can see only two solutions: > > > > 1) Removing the ignore_key_missing parameter from our Schema and tweak > > thing so that this will work, since we don't let the Schema accept > > missing fields the validation will be done by the widget validator and > > if not_empty=True you will receive an error otherwise all should work > > well. > > +1 I personally never use disabled_fields and I'd like the extra > sanitizing that will take place if missing keys are not ignored.
As long as this doesn't completely break disabled fields. JP Farias was the one who originally proposed (and submitted a patch for) disabled fields. I've cc'ed him in case he's not reading this list. It seems like this should be fine, because you wouldn't really disable a required field. Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
