On 4/11/06, Michele Cella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yep, probably food for FirstClass (am I right?), I was wondering today > (also inspired by Mark [1]) how much difficult could it be to write a > SQLObject wrapper that maps things to a SQLAlchemy database for > backward compatibility, the most difficult thing is probably the query > mechanism and SQLBuilder, but I've not used SQLObject or SQLAlchemy > that much so I'm probably plain wrong.
The main goal for First Class is the WSGI upgrade. The database upgrade will land as soon as it reasonably can, but I think the WSGI upgrade is a bit more straightforward in many ways. ActiveMapper makes SQLAlchemy look more like SQLObject (but doesn't implement the same names). SQLAlchemy's query syntax is very significantly influenced by SQLBuilder, so it should be possible to fashion a compatible interface there. Making a compatibility layer is really doable. Kevin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
