On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:22:51 -0400 "Kevin Dangoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/11/06, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I know my opinion doesn't really matter, but my company is planning > > on sticking with 1.0 when it's released and then waiting for First > > Class to become more stable. My understanding is that some things > > from SQLAlchemy would make our lives much easier. It would be nice > > if SQLAlchemy was at least an option in 1.0 (even if it was > > something added after release). > > I promise that we're working on that documentation thing.... > > TurboGears already offers support for SQLAlchemy. It just doesn't > offer backwards compatibility or fancy things like CatWalk, Model > Designer and FastData. > > Kevin Ok, let me rephrase my statement: I hope that 1.0 has support w.r.t. FastData, Identity, and CatWalk for SQLAlchemy. ;) Backwards compatibility would also be nice, but not entirely necessary, because we've already done a bunch of development using SQLObject. I think the guys would kill me if I tried to convert over to SQLAlchemy right now anyway... Jason
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
