On 9/24/06, Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Max Ischenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I am -0 on this becase, as Alberto pointed out, there is "setup.py test" > > command already. > > I'm -1. I don't see why everything has to be a "tg-*" command. See, for > example, "tg-admin sql" that makes people think that problems with SQLObject > are exclusively problems with TG. > I have to agree that "tg-admin sql" makes people think the problems are with TG but one feature this has is that it's much less painfull to use with all the defaults. if it didn't exist sending the same info to sqlobject-admin.
> Since no functionality will be added here, I don't see a reason to use such a > command. > I agree with it cause eventually we could improve the original nosetests. although at the moment I can't think of anything. > Besides, the setuptools test command allows one to use a different test > suite. If we implement something we might be limiting choices even more. > > -- > Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
