Kevin Horn wrote: > I think lots of people (certainly me, and I know of at least one other for > sure :) expect something like running all their tests to be accessible from > tg-admin. Until this thread, I certainly didn't know that setup.py was > already set up to run nose... > > If the concern is that nose will get too "hidden", how does "setup.py tests" > not do the same thing?
The concern (from my POV) is that setuptools is becoming a Python standard, so "python setup.py test" should also be a standard way to run unit tests. There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it. -- Matt Good --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
