It's definitely a good idea to define where 1.1 development will happen. If there isn't already 2.0 code on the trunk, I'd recommend using the trunk for 1.1 and then create a branch for the more experimental 2.0.
Kevin On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We know 1.0 is a feature fixed version, but I think tg 1.x worth to > merge some enhancement from trunk, such as: > > 1. internal toolbox code re-structure > this refactor had already appeared in trunk, and it make adding a new > tool more tangible. > > 2. add genshi-default quickstart generator(template). > It already exist in trunk, but need some trick up to become an extra > tgtemplate. > > 3. add Template browser in toolbox .. > It already exist in trunk for months. > It's nice to browse kid/genshi template within the toolbox. > > 4. add crud generator(template) > The default crud generator combines form widgets, subdirectory > importing, and optional paginate, error_handler, identity with > class...it could be a good demonstration and super time saver command > that make explicit and fully customizable CRUD usage. > > ..... > wishes from other people... > .... > > So, is it ok for me to branch a project(another code name or 1.1) in > svn to experiment these features? > > > > -- Kevin Dangoor TurboGears email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] company: http://www.BlazingThings.com blog: http://www.BlueSkyOnMars.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
