On Fri, 2007-26-01 at 00:29 -0500, Karl Guertin wrote: > On 1/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just commit the 1. and 3. to 1.0 branch, since they won't effect any > > exist APIs, and it is cool :-D > > But they do affect the documentation effort. Please do not add > features to stable branches. While it's trivial to add a page to > describe this feature, it's not simple to explain what features do and > do not exist in various 1.0.x releases. Please branch to 1.1 before > adding features.
Yes, exactly! And it *is* frustrating to new users and sends out a bad message. Sure, *we* know you are being careful. Those who are first being exposed to the project however come away with an impression of chaos and lack of structure. Then when they do hit a bug, they are all the more likely to throw up their hands and quit. I still do not see why, given the above, we should not use more branches. Something needs to be done because the present system is not working to produce a stable documented api that behaves in a predictable ( and thus debuggable ) manner for new users. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
