I will see if I can do a code review this weekend to clean up these issues.
On Mar 2, 6:22 pm, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2) Type checking inside the init of every file to the extent which you > > are checking is in my mind too much. Python is loosely typed for a > > reason, and you are adding considerable overhead with little benefit > > to the programmer, IMO. We neednt want fastdata2 to fail because it > > was too slow to use! > > I agree, if it looks like a provider, and walks like a provider, it > must be a provider! > > I finally had a chance to look at the code as it is, and I'm worried a > bit that we're looking at a lot of code to enforce design decisions, > and all that code costs something to design and to maintain. > > As for what to work on, I'd say the only provider I actually care > about is SQLAlchemy, and I care about that quite a bit more than > getting catwalk done this weekend. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
