On 1 jun, 13:41, "Paul Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Those algorithms are considered safe for password hashing. The break you're > referring to only affects the "no collisions" property, and password hashing > doesn't rely on that. MD5 and SHA1 will most likely be safe from this point > of view for years to come. > > Still we could have an option for the user to use any hash function they > like. > Hi,
Yes, it would be well that there'd be another hash functions. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
