On 6月28日, 上午1時53分, "Mark Ramm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, we actually require the current svn version, as we had to fix a bug > > in the Buffet template API handling in Pylons. > > I also understand (from Ben) that there are also some other changes to > the way Routes and the pylons controllers (which we inherit from) work > in pylons trunk would make our lives easier, so we started out with > trunk in the first place. > > We also want to track with Pylons as they add Babel support, and the > new database configuration stuff. > > --Mark
Hi, just commit in some install clarify for pylons dependency, Besides the unittest, I think it's really a good chance to provide API docs that we've been asked for years :p Anyone has a idea about API generation? -- Fred --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
