On Wednesday 22 August 2007 14:45:29 Paul Johnston wrote: > Hi, > > This ticket is about whether SQLAlchemy should do a rollback, if you > raise an exception in your controller method, and handle it with the > exception_handler decorator. > > Current behaviour is that it does NOT rollback in that instance. Should > we change this in TG1.1? My gut feel is that the desirable behaviour is > to rollback anything done in the failing controller method, and start a > new transaction for anything in the handler method. > > However, this is a behviour change. If I hear nothing from the list, > I'll assume this isn't a great issue and leave things be.
My opinion has always been: do the same as SQL Object does. Both interfaces should do the same thing and be as interchangeable as possible. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
