On Aug 24, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Paul Johnston wrote:
> > Hi, > >> My opinion has always been: do the same as SQL Object does. >> >> > Fair point. SQLObject currently has the same behaviour as > SQLAlchemy. If > we change SA we should change SO as well. > > Which leads us back to... do we want to make the change? +1 from me. I have no notes to back it up and my memory is not helping me here very much but I believe having some issues (maybe memory leaks?) when transactions were not rolled back if an exception ocurred. This was in the transaction handling middleware I posted in this list a couple of months ago (not on a TG app). Alberto --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
