On Nov 11, 2007 10:18 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apropos Cheetah, I wonder whether we should replace Cheetah with Tempita > (http://pythonpaste.org/tempita/). It's pure Python, more lightweight > than Cheetah, integrates well with Paste and, as Ian Bicking noted, will > eventually be required by TG 2.0 anyway, since it's needed by weberror. > > I suggest making that move in TG 1.1 already, i.e. use Tempita for the > quickstart templates. TG should also support Tempita's HTMLTemplate as > an alternative HTML templating language.
For deployment purposes yes... but what about templating? What is the difference in terms of performance? I don't use it so I cannot say for sure... I'll let the people who use it tell us. I have an idea that the c extension is quicker that a pure python implementation... Florent. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
