Florent Aide wrote: > On Nov 11, 2007 10:18 PM, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Apropos Cheetah, I wonder whether we should replace Cheetah with Tempita >> (http://pythonpaste.org/tempita/). It's pure Python, more lightweight >> than Cheetah, integrates well with Paste and, as Ian Bicking noted, will >> eventually be required by TG 2.0 anyway, since it's needed by weberror. >> >> I suggest making that move in TG 1.1 already, i.e. use Tempita for the >> quickstart templates. TG should also support Tempita's HTMLTemplate as >> an alternative HTML templating language. > > For deployment purposes yes... but what about templating? What is the > difference in terms of performance? > I don't use it so I cannot say for sure... I'll let the people who use > it tell us. I have an idea that the c extension is quicker that a pure > python implementation...
No, I didn't say we should stop supporting Cheetah for HTML views. But Cheetah shouldn't be required any more when it will not be needed for the quickstart templates any more. But you should still have the option of using Cheetah for your HTML views, plus there should be the additional option of using Tempita for that purpose as well. -- Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
