Here is an open invite to any developers who want to come down to Denver. I am happy to put you up. My family is visiting Maryland for a that weekend, so I have at least 4 beds available. I can also pick people up at DIA if y'all can coordinate timing.
I live about 30 minutes from Boulder, 45 minutes from DIA. I would be happy to provide food and beer as well. Part of the weekend could even be spent in outdoor pursuits. Great hiking/ snowshoeing/climbing/Skiing in/near the Front Range. I am willing to take Friday off work if people want to come in on thursday night and have a "play/planning" day on Friday. Hey, Zope had a snow sprint, why cant we? http://www.openplans.org/projects/snow-sprint-2008/project-home cheers. -chris On Feb 6, 8:36 am, "Kevin Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 9:05 AM, Lee McFadden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 6, 2008 9:37 AM, Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We've already got instructions for using AuthKit with TG2, so some auth* > > > solution is available already. Potential next steps are: > > > We do? If you're talking about the page in the 2.0 RoughDocs > > section[1] then I strongly disagree that we have instructions - that > > page consists of some barely explained notes and doesn't actually show > > how to use Authkit at all. > > > [1]:http://docs.turbogears.org/2.0/RoughDocs/AuthKit > > > > a) Making a TG1 identity compatible layer > > > b) Create a wonderful, all-powerful new auth* API > > > > Thing is, I'm not sure (a) is that important, or that we're ready to do > > (b) > > > just yet. > > > I would need to poke around with Authkit to actually have a good > > opinion on this but from what I've read elsewhere Authkit is good for > > authentication but annoyingly complex for authorization. Maybe a mix > > and match approach would be better? > > > I'm going to be starting a project with TG2 soon and auth/auth will be > > required so I'm hoping I'll be able to contribute to this effort. > > My preference is for b). Making authkit compatible with the TG Identity > framework would be pretty tough, because it just won't do some things that > Identity will. Or at least, it would be pretty ugly, and probably fragile. > I was pretty impressed when I initially read about authkit, but am becoming > less so, the more I find out. > > I had started some work on an auth layer about a month ago, but it got > stalled due to the 2.4 incompatibilities which were introduced with the > switch to WebOb (though those should be fixed now). I haven't had a chance > to go back to it, as I'm pretty much slammed at least through this week. I > probably just need to start over anyway. I'm really hoping to get some > serious progress made on this during the sprint (and maybe before). > > Kevin Horn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
