Hi,

>>We've already got instructions for using AuthKit with TG2, so some auth*
>>solution is available already. Potential next steps are:
>>    
>>
>We do?  If you're talking about the page in the 2.0 RoughDocs
>section[1] then I strongly disagree that we have instructions - that
>page consists of some barely explained notes and doesn't actually show
>how to use Authkit at all.
>[1]: http://docs.turbogears.org/2.0/RoughDocs/AuthKit
>  
>
The instructions are tried-and-tested, and get you going with AuthKit on 
TG2. AuthKit has its own documentation that describes the API.

>I would need to poke around with Authkit to actually have a good
>opinion on this but from what I've read elsewhere Authkit is good for
>authentication but annoyingly complex for authorization.  Maybe a mix
>and match approach would be better?
>  
>
Yes, I'm sure there are a few gems to be picked up from all the existing 
auth* systems. One thing I was thinking as well is creating a wiki page 
where people can share complex permissioning models they've created. 
There was some chat about these at my local PUG. The main requirement I 
have for auth* actually is integrated Windows authentication.

Paul

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to