On Wed, 2008-26-03 at 06:54 -0300, Jorge Godoy wrote: > > Em Wednesday 26 March 2008 04:39:50 Christoph Zwerschke escreveu: > > > From this point of view, it is important that we choose one JS lib to > > be used for widgets so that we can start building the standard widget lib. > > I think the jQuery is the way to go now... MochiKit is taking too long to > get > a new version and as you already said, it shouldn't grow more interesting > things.
Bob has said clearly that growing MochiKit is not a big priority right now because it already does what he wants. That's cool, and props to him for building it, but the fact that it is not under active development is definitely keeping away *new* users. So I think it would be a very poor decision for us to keep using it as an integrated component, it will come across that we are using "dead components" even though we know this is not true. Experts who know and love MochiKit on the other hand will not be hindered by a default swap out. It's a marketing decision I guess. I also have been really impressed with John Resig's (sp? jQuery lead ) attitude and I think it aligns well with the TG attitude and philosophy, which was a major reason for me to switch to TG in the first place. my two cents Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
