Florent Aide schrieb: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:28 PM, percious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Can you also provide a table of "overrides" which would allow you to >> add/remove a particular permission on a user-basis? > you mean having a user --> permission resolution route instead of a > user --> group --> permission ?
Why? Just stick the user n a group with only one member. I don't see the need for this? What _I_ would like to see is to be able to assign permissions to anonymous users or to all authenticated users. Maybe by giving an option to assign them to a specific group automatically. Something like a "identity.anonymous.groups = ['anonymous']" resp. "identity.authenticated.groups = ['authenticated']" setting. This could be handled completely in the IdentityWrapper. Chris --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
