percious couldn't you just make a new group for the 57 other users? or, as many groups as necessary to properly define the credentials? if you start down the path of overriding groups, you're going to end up with some variation of the confused deputy problem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confused_Deputy On Apr 16, 6:02 pm, percious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because I have 57 other users and I don't want to go around making > them part of the other two accepted groups. Takes too long, when I > only want to exclude a few users from doing things that all the others > can do. > > On Apr 15, 6:51 pm, Kevin Monceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Chris, > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, percious wrote: > > > The only thing is, a few of them I don't trust with various parts of the > > > 753 resources, but I dont want to put them in a special group because > > > a)its a pain to create a special group with 751 resources for each > > > special case, and B) I don't want the managers to know that I don't > > > trust them, I want them to have the same title as the others, but not > > > have access. > > > Well, how about creating a group with 751 resources that everyone is a > > member of and creating a separate group with the other two resources and > > making the trusted users a member of both groups? > > > Kevinhttp://www.RawFedDogs.nethttp://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org > > Bruceville, TX > > > Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes. > > Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla!!! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
