On Sat, 2008-31-05 at 18:24 -0400, Mark Ramm wrote: > I created a new TG2 landing page on turbogears.org: > > http://www.turbogears.org/2.0/index.html > > Ultimately I think we'll want to make this a bit more visually > distinct from the main TG page. And when we do our first beta release > (hopefully next week) I think we need to link to this page prominently > from the TurboGears.org front page.
A few comments re the marketing aspect, reject or use as you see fit ;-) - I personally don't like nextgen nextgen, a bit gimmicky - also this: > with the most powerful and flexible Object Relational Mapper (ORM) in the > world, and sounds like hyperbole and will turn off people who disagree instantly. This reminds of some of the old Django docs that really rubbed me the wrong way. SA doesn't need to be exagerrated - shouldn't pylons be in this sentence?: web frameworks including TurboGears 1 (of course), Django, and Rails. We - I think the integration with Pylons should be more prominently mentioned, it's very important because whether we like it or not, TG is seen as languishing right now and the merge/build-over with pylons if a real life saver - lastly, is there a reason we are using a width of 850px? as a front-ender for designers, I know they like space on the sides, but in this case I think we are too big for a dead old monitor and could have a more readable screen by taking it out to 950-1000px; thanks for listening! Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
