> - I personally don't like nextgen nextgen, a bit gimmicky

True.  But we need something concise and a bit catchy, and it was the
best I came up with while writing the page.  If you've got better test,
I personally am not that attached to what we have now.


>> with the most powerful and flexible Object Relational Mapper (ORM) in the 
>> world, and
> sounds like hyperbole and will turn off people who disagree instantly.

But it's the truth. ;)  I can tone it down a bit though.

> This reminds of some of the old Django docs that really rubbed me the
> wrong way. SA doesn't need to be exagerrated

This isn't docs, this is the marketing face of the project.   There is
a difference.
But I agree that we may want to done down things a bit.

> - I think the integration with Pylons should be more prominently
> mentioned, it's very important because whether we like it or not, TG is
> seen as languishing right now and the merge/build-over with pylons if a
> real life saver

I agree somewhat.   But I don;t want to emphasize the number of changes
too much.   The key here will be to highlight the tangible benefits of the
pylons connection more.

As to design concerns, I just used the existing design we had for TG.

I'm looking at doing a new design, and that one will have more floating width
so that we can make use of wider screens.

--Mark

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to