On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Diez B. Roggisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ken Kuhlman schrieb:
>> Done.  The remaining issues (that I know about) are documented in the
>> changelog.  I'm going to leave #1181 open until these items are
>> addressed.
>
> I've taken a look, and noticed the following:
>
>  - there are a few requirements missing:
>
>    - configobj, had to hand-install it. might be a configobj-issue
>
>    - webtest
>
>    - webob made trouble until being re-installed using easy_install -UZ
>
>    - RuleDispatch
>

Strange.. I added WebTest to the testtools section of setup.py in
r4694, but it's not there now.  I'll look into what happened.

>
>  - the failing widget test seems to me to be an artifact of the test
> not being run under an available request. That has the consequence that
> the building of a widget-path is somehow disrupted, and thus instead of
> a widget-id
>
>   form_<fieldname>
>
> we end up with
>
>   <fieldname>
>
> I can't finally confirm that - I have troubles getting 1.0.4 to run the
> tests. If I can prove that my theory is right, I will patch the test.
>
>
> Diez
>

I came to the same conclusion after several hours of digging around
yesterday.  util.request_available was broken prior to 1.5.

I fixed that test in r4973


Thanks for the feedback!   Any ideas on what's going on with visit?  :-)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears Trunk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to