Em Tuesday 19 August 2008 12:50:57 percious escreveu: > > I think SVN does not work well in the mode of development that > benefits TG2 the most: the sprint. Many of our sprints are held in > "pods" across the world. With a mecurial, git, or bzr repo, we can > have these pods committing locally to a on-site committer, negating > the need for passing around patches, or having everyone who is > involved in the sprint have a commit bit. In the past we have gotten > around this issue by creating a special user which everyone had the u/ > p for, but I don't think this is a very good solution.
Keeping SVN and using SVK (that has a very similar command set) we can do the same: create local branches, work on it doing several commits and then sync it later to the main repository, keeping history of each and every commit. > Obviously I am in favor of a distributed VCS system. I think Alberto > has created a highly useful integration between a website/trac/hg > repo, and if we can leverage that, I think we should. We may also > consider looking at git, and bzr, as HG has been getting some bad > press in the recent future. If it is to buy mobility at sprints, then I'd rather use SVK and keep everything as it is now. If there is any other reason, then I'd like to understand it as well. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
