Hello, If we're supposed to be in a feature-freeze, that's for people to be confident that from now on things aren't going to change, unless a critical bug has to be fixed, so that they can start building software and writing about TG2 with the guarantee that their product isn't going to expire some days later.
I love to see TG2 evolve, but that this has been applied in the feature-frozen branch I'm using to write a short series of articles using TG2 and that it already out dates the first article (which was delivered)... It really bothers me. If I can't trust that we were serious when we announced that feature freeze, then I'll switch over to a truly stable framework for my next article. On the other hand, independent of the article I wrote, I think we must comply with the feature freeze strictly, specially in non-trivial changes like this (splitting a function into three ones, defined in newly-created modules each). The more complex a change is, the more chances to introduce a bug. And at this point we shouldn't take the risk of introducing bugs, but just fix the remaining ones. Finally, I think this change has to be moved to the upcoming 2.1 branch (trunk, when there's a 2.0 branch). I love the idea, I think think it's reasonable, but I think it's too late to go in v2.0. Otherwise, this will be bad for PRs. Cheers, =Gustavo On Tuesday March 17, 2009 19:05:50 Mark Ramm wrote: > Works for me. We can try to shoehorn this into rc1 if we can get it > done in the next day or so -- otherwise it'll be a 2.1 feature. > > I want it done now, but making that happen will require updating > several docs :/ So, I'm a bit hesitant to about just going for it > directly. > > --Mark Ramm > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Florent Aide <florent.a...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:56 PM, percious <ch...@percious.com> wrote: > >> I have begun work on our new extensions methodology. (Some call this > >> component architecture). I am working with Jorge and Jon to try and > > > > [...] > > > >> websetup/ > >> __init__.py : contains setup_app which will be a combination of > >> bootstrap and schema setup > > > > nice this will definitely make things easier. > > > > Florent. -- Gustavo Narea <xri://=Gustavo>. | Tech blog: =Gustavo/(+blog)/tech ~ About me: =Gustavo/about | --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to turbogears-trunk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
