I am fine with adding them to quickstart in 2.1 as an option. In fact I think that could be very useful.
I think there are some concerns about the complexity of the QS template, and I think that we do need to be mindful of that, but supporting Mako out of the box is an important goal. --Mark Ramm On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:24 AM, percious <[email protected]> wrote: > > I feel that the mako support is just as good as genshi, in terms of > the framework code. I primarily use mako for it's concise syntax and > speed. I have built master/index for mako and would be happy to > publish them, but I have received a bit of pushback from the TG2 team > whilst recommending adding them to the quickstart template (no one > wants to be responsible for their maintenance, although I volunteered > for the job). The mako version of quickstart is 400% faster for the > index page, and it speeds up the Admin pages by about 50%. > > cheers. > -chris > > On May 14, 4:07 pm, cd34 <[email protected]> wrote: >> Mako and Cheetah seem to have rudimentary support, but, aren't well >> supported. >> >> Genshi seems to be very well supported, but, quite a bit of the >> development points to jinja2. >> >> Is jinja2 going to be the primary engine? or should I stick with >> genshi? Jinja2 has some nice features that I would like to use, but, >> I would prefer to use whatever the primary engine is that TurboGears >> is going to stick with. > > > -- Mark Ramm-Christensen email: mark at compoundthinking dot com blog: www.compoundthinking.com/blog --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
