Le 16/02/2011 14:01, Christoph Zwerschke a écrit : > Am 16.02.2011 12:44, schrieb Christophe de Vienne: >> What about using http://www.shiningpanda.com (or maybe some other >> equivalent service) ? > > shiningpanda looks interesting, but is not yet available as it seems.
Indeed. It might be interesting to contact them though. Do anybody knows some equivalent service ? >> IMHO it is worth fully migrating to SF, even if limited -> having to >> maintain those tools should not be a burden for the dev team. >> As for the hosted trac, I would avoid it in the long term. > > You mean Trac in general, or a hosted Trac on SF? hosted on SF. > I can imagine using a > current Trac version on our own server, as one instance with two (or > three) Trac environments for TG1 and TG2 (and TG3), each configured to > use the corresponding repository. For TG2 (and TG3) we would need the > Git plugin as Trac has built-in support only for SVN. Which add some work to maintain all this. I know it is not that difficult, but leaving it all to the SF team will let more time to concentrate on TG itself. My 2 cents :-) Christophe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to turbogears-trunk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
