On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Alessandro Molina < [email protected]> wrote:
> I would suggest having the main tgext pieces directly inside a tg2ext > repository on SF and have them released with each TG release. > Probably it might also be a good idea to have some of them installed > directly with TG2 as they are useful for any project (like what we do > with tgext.crud and tgext.admin). > Having them integrated inside the project itself would imply more > testing to them by the users and so a more stable suite of > extensions. > Well, I'm not so sure about making them required installations. That seems like it could expand dependencies where we should be trying to reduce dependencies. But integrating them into the release cycle, and integrating them into a single repository? That is something I could get behind. Means that a lot of extensions are going to see a significant version jump (to give them the same version as TG itself), but that's okay. Is it already online the GSOC page? > I can get access only to the previous editions from the TG homepage > Negative. I'm going to work to get the ideas up this weekend, and get a preview of the application available. Not sure who all should get that yet, though. Still, it'll be progress, and that is what counts. -- Michael J. Pedersen My IM IDs: Jabber/[email protected], ICQ/103345809, AIM/pedermj022171 Yahoo/pedermj2002, MSN/[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
