On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Alessandro Molina <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm for the "None" / "default" way, the change was because it sounded > confusing to have the user write a list of authenticators and end up > having a different one. Also disabling the default authenticator was > more complex than it should have been. Going for the default/None way > would provide the best of the two worlds. > > As soon as Michael ends moving things to github I think we can merge > the patch and include it in a future 2.2.1 release.
No need to wait even. The repositories will be copied wholesale, so the push can be done whenever. The only things that are being a pain are the issues themselves, and that just takes time to finish working through. This week, hopefully. As for my preference, I like the best of both worlds approach. -- Michael J. Pedersen My Online Resume: http://www.icelus.org/ -- Google+ http://plus.ly/pedersen Google Talk: [email protected] -- Twitter: pedersentg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears Trunk" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears-trunk?hl=en.
