Guyon, it may be that when I specified the column names for the intermediate table I may have confused them. I'll check, and if it's wrong, I'll fix it.

On 4 Dec, 2005, at 9:15 pm, Guyon Morée wrote:

the difference was the contents of tg_user_group.


there are 2 fields and in my point of view:

   user_id holds the user_id

   group_id holds the group_id where this user belongs to.


well, thats not the case right now, because it works the other way

around. group_id holds the newly inserted user_id and user_id has the

group_id in it.


is that illogical reasoning on my part or is it a bug?


--

Jeff Watkins

http://newburyportion.com/


"Just because you have the right to do something, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do."

-- Fred Friendly, former president of CBS News



Reply via email to