On 1/4/06, Alvin Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <rant> SQLobject bothers me.  I have been reading the mailing list and
> it seems like the solution to a lot of problems is to go directly to
> the database and bypass SQLObject.  This makes the code less portable.

Check this Ben Bangert's article about doing SQL portably with SQLObject:
http://www.groovie.org/articles/2005/11/01/how-to-use-database-agnostic-sql-in-sqlobject

Kevin

Reply via email to