On 1/11/06, Jonathan LaCour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:06 AM, Kevin Dangoor wrote: > > Which brings me to PasteDeploy. Ian has been keeping up with the > > CherryPy 2.2 changes and trying to make sure that the level of WSGI > > support needed for PasteDeploy is met by CP 2.2's more flexible > > routing. The CP2.2 transition is something we can make for TG0.9, but > > the PasteDeploy transition is not. I do think that using PasteDeploy > > is a good goal and that it should be done right when CP is ready for > > it. > > Does this only apply to 0.9, or does it also apply for 1.0? I have > no issue with not having Paste Deploy in 0.9, as I can see the clear > need to get a release out the door. But, I am worried about having > the first really frozen release go out the door without Paste Deploy.
Assuming all of the CP issues are dealt with, I can see TurboGears 1.0 using PasteDeploy. Kevin
