Cliff Wells wrote:
> Perhaps what I'll try is to just leave SQLObject in place in order to
> allow support of Identity and whatever else may like to use it, but just
> open my own psycopg connection for doing my own stuff.

Same here.

Jeff Watkins wrote:
> It's only a matter of time before I write a SQLAlchemy-based
> IdentityProvider...

Let me add my voice to having Identity decoupled from SQLObject (or
SQLAlchemy, for that matter).

Jeff Bauer

Reply via email to